Comment about Committee Scandals
I want to clear an issue up before we are confronted with it. As Patio said, the committee assignment system is subject to kickback exposure and scandal. This is not a bad thing because it regulates the committee system.
If enough Voters cry "kickback" the proposer will probably self-fail. I predict that at first none of us will expose the kickback since we want to get our Committee choices, but later "Committee Assignment Committee Meetings" will be increasingly likely to get sunk.
I stand corrected. The CACM do not contain a kickback, as the proposal does not specify what to do with the vote choices, a rule does. So CACM are not regulated by threat of scandal and I'm changing my mind - I think the PM should control them. If he doesn't do it in a timely fashion, we'll just start making freeform nomination proposals to get on committees.
If enough Voters cry "kickback" the proposer will probably self-fail. I predict that at first none of us will expose the kickback since we want to get our Committee choices, but later "Committee Assignment Committee Meetings" will be increasingly likely to get sunk.
I stand corrected. The CACM do not contain a kickback, as the proposal does not specify what to do with the vote choices, a rule does. So CACM are not regulated by threat of scandal and I'm changing my mind - I think the PM should control them. If he doesn't do it in a timely fashion, we'll just start making freeform nomination proposals to get on committees.
<< Home