Proposal: Debate
Adds a new rule, Debate:
Vetoed by the Prime Minister; failed 11/9 by Simon.
Any Lord may start a debate with another Lord by posting a caucus with the subject: Debate with [Lord]. The post must include the topic of the debate (such as the economic crisis hitting BlogNomia) and who is to be the moderator. The moderator must be from a different Party than both the Lords.I removed the electoral votes for this rule because we are supposed to be undecided voters for this rule.
The moderator will think of a question to ask the Lord of the moderator's choice. That Lord then will respond with an answer to the question. The other lord may then respond with a rebuttal. The moderator replies with another question, this time directed at the other Lord. That Lord responds, then the other one replies with a rebuttal.
At this point everyone from all Parties may vote on it. A FOR vote is showing that the Initiater won, AGAINST says that the other Lord won. Those are the only legal votes. Electoral votes do not matter. If the number of FOR votes is equal to or greater than Quorum, then the initiater won. If the number of AGAINST votes is equal to or greater than Quorum, then the initiater won.
If the initiater won, than the initiater gains 4% of the Percent, and 10 confidence. The other Lord loses 2% of the Percent and 5 confidence. If the initiater wins, then the initiater loses 4% of the Percent, and 10 confidence. The other Lord gains 4% of the percent and 10 confidence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e8af/2e8af9242ffa552560a219dbcca53a002d8db254" alt=""
<< Home