Call For Judgment: Changing rule 24
Josh made an illegal change to rule 24, for two reasons:
From rule 2: "For the purposes of rules other than 1 and 2, idle Disciples are not counted as Disciples", but rule 24 does not care whether Aaron is a Disciple or not, as it simply mentions him by name.
Even if you decide that for game purposes, a reference to "Aaron" is the same as a reference to "Disciple Aaron", we run into another problem, which we have already dealt with once. We specifically added a line to the glossary in reaction to somebody else's changing of rule 24, because of the vague "dinner time".
Any Disciple can spell better than a non-existing one, but since the spelling contest must happen at an undefined time, it cannot be resolved.
Therefore, if this Call for Judgment passes, rule 24 is reverted back to its state before Josh's change.
From rule 2: "For the purposes of rules other than 1 and 2, idle Disciples are not counted as Disciples", but rule 24 does not care whether Aaron is a Disciple or not, as it simply mentions him by name.
Even if you decide that for game purposes, a reference to "Aaron" is the same as a reference to "Disciple Aaron", we run into another problem, which we have already dealt with once. We specifically added a line to the glossary in reaction to somebody else's changing of rule 24, because of the vague "dinner time".
Any Disciple can spell better than a non-existing one, but since the spelling contest must happen at an undefined time, it cannot be resolved.
Therefore, if this Call for Judgment passes, rule 24 is reverted back to its state before Josh's change.
<< Home