Call for Judgement

Kevan passed Point Fiddling before its voting was complete, and scored it according to the previous scoring method whereas last time a Proposal-scoring method was enacted it scored according to its own method - even after my Call for Judgement. So I call for having consistency, at least - if Proposals are going to alter the ruleset before triggering enaction-events, it should continue to be the case.

Due to awkwardness of the situation, I have to propose remedies in two pieces:
1. If, when this CfJ completes, the original Proposal has sufficient votes to pass, then the points given by Kevan should be removed, and points according to the Proposal's own rule assigned in their place, otherwise
2. If, when this CfJ completes, the original Proposal still has not sufficient votes to be passed, then the points given by Kevan should be removed and the Proposal's state should be reverted to the state that it is supposed to be in according to the votes at that time (either Failed or Pending). The Proposal's effects on the Ruleset should be retracted.