Call for Judgment
The fourth paragraph of Rule 2 says, "For the purposes of all other rules, Idle Players are not counted as Players." I submit that this means Raven's votes ceased to count as valid on proposals the moment he went idle. I offer as evidence to this that Kevan declared quorum to be four after he went idle, which means Raven no longer factors into quorum.
Therefore, Raven's vote should not have counted on the proposal entitled "Board Revamp". Alternately, if it was to be counted because he was a player at the time, the proposal should also require a quorum of five as was the case at the time. In either case, the "Board Revamp" proposal should not have been enacted by Kevan.
I recommend the effects of the proposal be reversed, Raven's vote on the proposal be ignored, and the proposal returned to the Pending state.
The fourth paragraph of Rule 2 says, "For the purposes of all other rules, Idle Players are not counted as Players." I submit that this means Raven's votes ceased to count as valid on proposals the moment he went idle. I offer as evidence to this that Kevan declared quorum to be four after he went idle, which means Raven no longer factors into quorum.
Therefore, Raven's vote should not have counted on the proposal entitled "Board Revamp". Alternately, if it was to be counted because he was a player at the time, the proposal should also require a quorum of five as was the case at the time. In either case, the "Board Revamp" proposal should not have been enacted by Kevan.
I recommend the effects of the proposal be reversed, Raven's vote on the proposal be ignored, and the proposal returned to the Pending state.
<< Home