Proposal: Patching a loophole (redux)

Okay guys, here's a better fix to the loophole problem I discussed in this original proposal, based on Kevan and Cayvie's feedback.

Your feedback said you didn't want to add another sentence, so this proposal alters the third paragraph, adding "and if either no earlier Proposals are still pending," and basically making it identical to the rules for FOR voting, like you recommended.

I propose we alter Rule #5, paragraph 3 to patch the loophole:

If a pending Proposal's AGAINST votes exceed or equal quorum, and if either no earlier Proposals are still pending, or if all Citizens have voted on a Proposal and it still cannot be Enacted, or if the Citizen whose Proposal it was has voted AGAINST it, then any Admin Staff may mark that Proposal as Failed.

I also self-failed the original proposal to move the queue along.

Vetoed by Kevan.