Proposal: Duel for Revenge

In Rule 20, Add:

• Under Challenge:

  *Revenge: The Challenger must have a Casus Belli against the Defendant. In the challenge, there must be a description of where it will take place and what cannot be used. Also, the challenge should name one Warlord to be the Moderator. No responses can be made to the post until the Moderator has posted the strategies.
  

• Under Test of Skill:

  *Revenge: Both the Challenger and the Defendant must write a strategy, which includes what they will do to win the duel (ie: sneak behind the tree, than ready my bow and etc. , etc.), and email it to the Moderator. If no response is sent to the Moderator from one of the Warlords within 48 hours, then the Warlord with no response is said to have left the duel. That Warlord loses 15 reputation and the duel is considered resolved.
  

• Under Resolution:

  *Revenge: The Moderator then replies to the original challenge with the strategies received. Then, any Warlord may respond to the challenge with a vote of FOR, AGAINST, or DEFERENTIAL, for who they think has the best strategy. DEFERENTIAL will refer to the leader of that Warlords alliance, or if they are the leader, to the High Lord. A vote of FOR means that the challenger won, AGAINST means that the defendant won. The challenger wins if the number of FOR votes equals or exceeds Quorum, and loses if the number of AGAINST votes equals or exceeds Quorum. If the challenger wins, the defendant is off his/her Casus Belli and loses 10 reputation. If the challenger loses, the challenger loses 12 reputation.

6-0 Reached Quorum. Enacted by Orson, October 24