Call For Judgement

Simon made an illegal Admin move he enacted a proposal out of order.

Rule 6 Enactment states

If the oldest pending Proposal's FOR votes exceed or equal Quorum, or if it is more than 48 hours old and more than half of its votes are FOR, then any Admin Staff may mark that Proposal as Enacted, then update the Ruleset and/or Gamestate to include the specified effects of that Proposal.

If the oldest pending Proposal has enough AGAINST votes that it could not be Enacted without one of those votes being changed, or if all Families have voted on it and it still cannot be Enacted, or if the Family who proposed it has voted AGAINST it, or if it is more than 48 hours old and most of its votes are AGAINST, then any Admin Staff may mark that Proposal as Failed. When the proposer votes against his or her own proposal, that vote may not be changed.

As Purity was not the oldest at time of enactment its enactment should not be allowed until the three proposals before it are enacted. As such my priest should still be married to my non-priest, and Simon should lose 7 Thalers for jumping the gun.

If purity becomes legally enacted before this CFJ is resolved then my priest and non-priest remain un-married but Simon still loses Thalers.

Do not look at this as 'I don't want a priest married' but rather as 'Rules must be followed'

Failed 1-10. Failed by Simon, 7th of December.