Call for Judgement

There is a disgreement in the comments of the proposal "No, you suck," between Ben and Knightking. The proposal contains the sentence "Hordes with zero zombies do not count as hordes for non-core rules except where otherwise stated by the ruleset." Knightking is reading this as "A horde, defined by this sentence as having at least one zombie, which has no zombies...," which results in a meaningless proposal, while Ben is reading it as "A horde, defined by rule two as being a player, who has no zombies...."

The action I suggest taking is to change the sentence in question to "Hordes with zero zombies do not count as hordes for non-core rules except for this rule and where otherwise stated by the ruleset." either in the proposal if it has not yet been enacted or failed, or in the rule if it has been enacted. Should the proposal have failed, there is, obviously, no need to take action.

Agreeing with the CfJ indicates that you agree with Knightking's interpretation and wish to take the action detailed in the previous paragraph. Disagreeing means you share Ben's interpretation, and see no need to change the proposal/rule.

8-9 (2 deferential not counted). Call for Judgement Fails. Failed by Smith, 31st of Dec.