Call For Judgement
Er, Chronos enacted "Shop Till You Drop... Dead" as having 10-0 votes.
By my count, it has 7 for, 4 against, and 2 deferential votes which haven't counted either way due to Knightking not voting yet. Now, I've nothing against this proposal passing if and when it does, but this is definitely a precedent I don't want to set. Admins enacting proposals whenever they want, regardless of quorum? And, as far as I can tell, not correctly counting the votes involved? (Or mistakingly counting the votes on some other proposal as being for that one.)
Now, I understand it would be easy to get mixed up, especially enacting a large pile of proposals in one fell swoop, so I suggest that we simply return the proposal to pending status, undo its effects and take back the brains rewarded from its enactment until it is enacted properly, and let Chronos off with a light warning this time.
4-3. Call for Judgement Passes. Enacted by Smith, 31st of Dec.
By my count, it has 7 for, 4 against, and 2 deferential votes which haven't counted either way due to Knightking not voting yet. Now, I've nothing against this proposal passing if and when it does, but this is definitely a precedent I don't want to set. Admins enacting proposals whenever they want, regardless of quorum? And, as far as I can tell, not correctly counting the votes involved? (Or mistakingly counting the votes on some other proposal as being for that one.)
Now, I understand it would be easy to get mixed up, especially enacting a large pile of proposals in one fell swoop, so I suggest that we simply return the proposal to pending status, undo its effects and take back the brains rewarded from its enactment until it is enacted properly, and let Chronos off with a light warning this time.
4-3. Call for Judgement Passes. Enacted by Smith, 31st of Dec.
<< Home