Splitting Hairs

I don't really think that Cayvie has a great case against my use of the word "YES" instead of "FOR" in my Walker's Unite proposal. However, Smith, if you want to head off Cayvie at the pass (and add further complications and confrontations to the game), as well as protect your kickback, you could issue a "Formatting Edict" restricting proposals to use the word "YES" instead of the word "FOR". I think there's a good case that this edict would be within the very vaguely defined constraints set out in Rule 19.