Call for Judgement

Every Family Member should be 30 years old now, as every current Family Member started at an age of 0 and the calendar has been advanced three times -- twice by Smith and once by Kevan. Rule 11: Family states that all Family Members have a birthdate, but the same rule does not provide for this birthdate to be listed in the 'Members' field in the GNDT.

According to the GNDT, every Family Member is still 10 years old (except mine, whom I have aged on my own). Rule 16, Calendar, does not suggest that the advancement of the calendar 10 years actually causes the Age of any Family Member to increase by 10 and as far as I can tell no other rule does either; we just seem to have been assuming that this is logical, which of course it is.

My recommendation is that all Family Members be given an age equal to the amount of time that has passed since their birth (which is 30, as of my writing this). It's easier than turning back the clock -- things have already occurred with the assumption in place that Family Members have higher Ages than 10.

It would also seem we need a proposal to actually connect forwarding the calendar with increasing Members' Ages, but that will come later I suppose.

0-8. Timed out. Failed by Smith, 10th of Dec.